Poor Grammar May Lead To Poor Rankings for Bing Search Results

Started by Paresh shrimali, 02-24-2014, 22:23:35

Previous topic - Next topic

cliftonmor

I also do not agree that misspelled words can get traffic. The content has to be high quality else it can affect search results.


Ensafeindia

Google, Bing, and Yahoo pay a lot of thoughtfulness regarding the measure of time perusers spend on any ... mistakes result in a high skip rate and lower internet searcher rankings.


davilama2682

I am a stickler for grammar. Forums are usually the ones who choose to keep misspelled words in the threads in order to get that misspelled word traffic. But I wouldn't do that if it were my case. Editing content for grammar is part of web site management. The posts with misspelled words in them are not noteworthy (crappy posts) not even full sentences usually. Beefy content with text and poise get web crawler attention and user attention. I don't use BING often for search but I commend them for doing this. Its easy for them to do this knowing what words are misspelled and which ones are not. Do a ratio of misspellings per page or something as metric of site owner's attentiveness to its own web content it publishes.
  •  

Lishmalinyjames

Bing will demote content that has poor grammar or typos in order to increase the quality of search results. can hurt website rankings.

chloetanner21

I don't trust sites that have misspelled words seems not a legit site for me. That's why website owners should double check their contents.
  •  


sproutmedia7

Typo mistake kind of practices are thing of a past, new spiders don't care much about the words they look into the intention behind the product.
  •  

davilama2682

Quote from: sproutmedia7 on 09-06-2021, 22:57:25
new spiders don't care much about the words they look into the intention behind the product.
What if your product is content marketing that is just written words? Or a personal blog?

Consumers still care about typos in what they are consuming! I find typos regularly in articles published by MSN and shown to me in EDGE browser as newsworthy items. These poorly edited publications get disseminated through internet channels right in my browser. Large publications have reputation, numbers, and clout behind them. If professional editors are letting mistakes fly by to post articles about TIKTOK videos (which is ridiculous journalism by the way) they could afford to take the hit to their reputation for misspellings. However, the question for webmasters is could YOU risk that reputation hit by not double checking your wording? I was reading a physical published book last week that had spelling errors in it. I remember the spelling error the most out of everything read in entire book.
  •  

dark404

This could in general appear to be a little "down in the weeds", however similarly as you're passing judgment on others' composition, so the motors judge yours. On the off chance that you battle to move beyond grammatical mistakes, how could a motor show a page of content with blunders higher in the rankings when different pages of mistake free satisfied exist to serve the searcher? Like it or not, we're decided by the nature of the outcomes we show. So we are continually watching the nature of the substance we see.