web 2.0 is still a good idea?

Started by digitalludhiana, 09-17-2020, 17:06:39

Previous topic - Next topic

digitalludhianaTopic starter

I know, it's stupid to ask. But even if it's working, I want to give it a try (hope it's not gonna do anything bad to my website). Any technique that can be used to get backlinks from in a short time with getting penalized. Please share some web urls that can be used for article posting to get do-follow backlinks, please..


nisargshah

Yes, WEB 2.0 is the best idea for link building, link wheel also there you can create a huge no of backlnks for your site.
https://www.yatharthmarketing.com/corporate-training-programs-mumbai-pune-bangalore-delhi-ahmedabad.html
https://www.yatharthmarketing.com/top-corporate-training-services-company.html
  •  


sophiawils59

Yes, web 2.0 is still a proper idea if you do it properly.

katebonnerwrite

That is the real question. The idea of ​​a tiered link building or a free private blog network is nothing new. Long before the panda and penguin came on stage, this kind of link building has been going on for years. Most of the posts you read about Web 2.0 link building come from 2012 or 2013, when it was in its last days, before it ended.

it's fine; I think web 2.0 link building is a bit of a collapse industry. It can still work, but it has a lot of flaws.

Google may not penalize your main site for using this method, but it is not afraid to artificially impose a no-flow on your tiered links so that you do not take them seriously.
Setting up for free blogs costs less, but it takes a lot of time to set up the whole process properly, and it can cost a lot to buy valuable content to build more sites.
Every 2.0 effort, time, and money you spend to link to the Web 2.0 method is the effort, time, or money that you can spend on improving your site or marketing in more legitimate ways. You can beat your share elsewhere.
As a gray hat technique, being discovered and out can damage your reputation. Some people, especially advanced marketers, do not like to partner with marketers who use techniques they do not like. This means that it can be difficult to find legitimate contacts with influential people, which is the next big wave in marketing.
So, the technique works, but it's a risk. It is unlikely to be more beneficial than before, but it is just as likely. The energy you put into building sites can be wasted if they don't cost you more.
  •  

farookriaz

Absolutely Good idea bro..because still, some blogs are not accepted our posts due to some spam reasons. so and that time this Web2.0 will help us to generate content with links, images, etc. so easy to reach people and placed in search engines with viewable results.

Farook
Marketer
CyberSecOp
Farook,
Marketer newbielink:https://cybersecop.com/ [nonactive]
  •  


digitalludhianaTopic starter

Quote from: katebonnerwrite on 11-10-2020, 01:07:15
That is the real question. The idea of ​​a tiered link building or a free private blog network is nothing new. Long before the panda and penguin came on stage, this kind of link building has been going on for years. Most of the posts you read about Web 2.0 link building come from 2012 or 2013, when it was in its last days, before it ended.

it's fine; I think web 2.0 link building is a bit of a collapse industry. It can still work, but it has a lot of flaws.

Google may not penalize your main site for using this method, but it is not afraid to artificially impose a no-flow on your tiered links so that you do not take them seriously.
Setting up for free blogs costs less, but it takes a lot of time to set up the whole process properly, and it can cost a lot to buy valuable content to build more sites.
Every 2.0 effort, time, and money you spend to link to the Web 2.0 method is the effort, time, or money that you can spend on improving your site or marketing in more legitimate ways. You can beat your share elsewhere.
As a gray hat technique, being discovered and out can damage your reputation. Some people, especially advanced marketers, do not like to partner with marketers who use techniques they do not like. This means that it can be difficult to find legitimate contacts with influential people, which is the next big wave in marketing.
So, the technique works, but it's a risk. It is unlikely to be more beneficial than before, but it is just as likely. The energy you put into building sites can be wasted if they don't cost you more.

You are right.. as it does consume a lot of time... and you said that doing so, won't be hurting my main domain.. how's that?
and I did checked in some resources.. about web 2.0 is a spammy technique and what I think is, we are only directing links to our site.. what about if we direct at least 5 links to high authority sites and 1 link to our site.. something like that, won't make that page a spammy page as, it's connected to several high authority content pages? I hope you got my point here..

Yuga

'Web 2.0' is really an encapsulation of the greater economy: major trends relating to the internet, human communication patterns and investment opportunities. As such, agreeing upon a definition would be impossible because the change means different things to different people.

saravanan28

'Web 2.0' is really an encapsulation of the greater economy: major trends relating to the internet, human communication patterns and investment opportunities. As such, agreeing upon a definition would be impossible because the change means different things to different people
  •  


seigell971

Yes getting backlinks from web 2.0 website is good ideas. Wen 2.0 websites are free of cost and you will get do follow backlinks. You should also promote your web 2.0 website to boost your domain authority.
Amina Seigell
Digital marketing Manager at https://seigellconsultants.com/
  •  


johnloyatt

Hi,
Web 2.0 ideas are not inherently bad for users. They can be highly effective; we sometimes see examples of usability-enhancing Web 2.0 designs in our studies. But it's more common to find Web 2.0 ideas that either hurt users or simply don't matter to users' core needs. While the latter case might seem innocent, irrelevant website "enhancements" diminish profits because they indicate a failure to focus on those simpler design issues that actually increase sales and leads.
Thanks and contact me if you require
newbielink:http://"https://www.netkingtechnologies.com/seo-services-india/" [nonactive] services in India
  •