String Buffer

From Seo Wiki - Search Engine Optimization and Programming Languages

Jump to: navigation, search

In object-oriented programming, a String Buffer is an alternative to a String. It has the ability to be altered through adding or appending, whereas a String is normally fixed or unchangeable.

Contents

Java's approach

Theory

Java's standard way to handle text is to use its Template:Javadoc:SE class. Any given String in Java is an immutable object, which means its state cannot be changed. A String has an array of characters. Whenever a String must be manipulated, any changes require the creation of a new String (which, turn, involves the creation of a new array of characters, and copying of the original array). This happens even if the original String's value or intermediate Strings used for the manipulation are not kept.

Java provides an alternate class for string manipulation, called a StringBuffer (see also StringBuffer and StringBuilder). A StringBuffer, like a String, has an array to hold characters. It, however, is mutable (its state can be altered). Its array of characters is not necessarily completely filled (as oppose to a String, whose array is always the exact required length for its contents). Thus, it has the capability to add, remove, or change its state without creating a new object (and without the creation of a new array, and array copying). The exception to this is when its array is no longer of suitable length to hold its content. In this case, it is required to create a new array, and copy contents.

For these reasons, Java would handle an expression like

String newString = aString + anInt + aChar + aDouble;

like this:

String newString = (new StringBuffer(aString)).append(anInt).append(aChar).append(aDouble)).toString();

Implications

Generally, a StringBuffer is more efficient than a String in string handling. However, this is not necessarily the case, since a StringBuffer will be required to recreate its character array when it runs out of space. Theoretically, this is possible to happen the same number of times as a new String would be required, although this is unlikely (and the programmer can provide length hints to prevent this). Either way, the effect is not noticeable in modern desktop computers.

As well, the shortcomings of arrays are inherent in a StringBuffer. In order to insert or remove characters are arbitrary positions, whole sections of arrays must be moved.

The method by which a StringBuffer is attractive in an environment with low processing power takes this ability by using too much memory, which is likely also at a premium in this environment. This point, however, is trivial, considering the space required for creating many instances of Strings in order to process them. As well, the StringBuffer can be optimized to "waste" as little memory as possible.

The Template:Javadoc:SE class, introduced in J2SE 5.0, differs from StringBuffer in that it is unsynchronized. When only a single thread at a time will access the object, using a StringBuilder is more efficient than using a StringBuffer.

StringBuffer and StringBuilder are included in the Template:Javadoc:SE package.

C#'s approach

Microsoft's .NET has a StringBuilder class in its Base Class Library.

See also

Links

ja:StringBufferとStringBuilder

Personal tools

Served in 0.080 secs.