What is the best static site generator?

[Lisbently]

I decided to make a notion on the best static site generator available in the web.
What providers can you suggest me to try?
Found Flatsite.com but still don't know if you can trust them.
Do you know anything about them?
Alternatives for comparison?

[saravanan28]

Static site generators are perhaps best suited to sites containing no more than a few hundred pages with a couple of new posts every week. Automated build and deploy processes will be required, and you may reach a point where a CMS becomes a more practical option.

[Nickindred]

There is far too much reliance on automated responses with some providers but with Flatsite.com you get that personal touch with email replies from their support that are so fast it is almost unbelievable. Glad to use FlatSite. Highly recommend this solution.

[Mala123]

Static site generators are maybe the most ideal to destinations containing something like two or three hundred pages with several new posts consistently. Computerized fabricate and send cycles will be required, and you might arrive where a CMS turns into a more viable choice.

[f1dark]

Static site generators are perhaps best suited to sites containing no more than a few hundred pages with a couple of new posts every week

[codiant]

Best Static Site Generators
1. Jekyll
2. Hugo
3. Gridsome
4. Eleventy
5. Pelican

[Mr. ML]

seoag and only manually with a template =)

[Carbatterynz]

The best static site generator depends on your project needs and skill level. For simplicity and performance, Hugo or Eleventy are great; for full JavaScript support, Next.js or Gatsby shine. Choose based on build speed, community support, and how often your content updates.